Minimally Invasive Knee Replacement (cont.)
IN THIS ARTICLE
Quadriceps-Sparing Knee Replacement and Lateral Approach Knee Replacement
Quadriceps-Sparing Knee Replacement
To truly spare the quadriceps tendon from any cutting, a different variation of minimally invasive surgery, called quadriceps-sparing knee replacement, can be used. This surgical approach is not new. Another name for it is the subvastus approach. "Subvastus approach" means going under the vastus muscle, which is part of the quadriceps muscle group. In essence, the surgeon makes a small (3- to 4-inch) skin opening. Next, the surgeon opens a fibrous layer of tissue (called the retinaculum) attached to the quadriceps muscle. and enters the knee joint. Finally, to expose the knee joint enough to insert the replacement, the surgeon takes the cut in the retinaculum further up into the thigh. This is done without cutting or injuring the quadriceps tendon. The quadriceps muscle is instead lifted up out of the way, so special instruments can be positioned for the operation.
The incision for the quadriceps-sparing knee replacement is only as large as is necessary to place the replacement parts in the body. The cut into the skin is shorter, and the underlying cut to reach the bone through the deep tissues is also shorter than for standard knee replacement surgeries, so the quadriceps is not cut. Special instruments are used to access and prepare the bone through such a small incision. Implants designed for this type of procedure and occasionally X-ray guidance are also used for this surgery. This surgery is best performed by experienced surgeons with special training in this procedure.
This type of surgery cannot be performed on all people. Surgeons carefully select people for whom this procedure is possible. Yet most people who are candidates for total knee replacement are suitable for this procedure.
Results after quadriceps-sparing knee replacement are generally dramatically better than results after knee replacements performed through a 4-inch incision using the standard technique. Benefits include an early return to walking, greatly reduced pain, and a remarkably different overall recovery. Scarring and soft tissue trauma underneath the skin are minimal.
Pain control measures can also speed up recovery. A painkiller may be given before the surgery, and a nerve block may be given in the thigh to numb the leg. Pain pumps that infuse painkillers into the incision may also be used. Early exercise is also encouraged to speed up recovery.
Today, most knee replacements done in the United States use parts that attach to the bone with special cement. A newer material called tantalum, a material similar to bone in porosity, may also be used. When this metal is placed against bone, it allows bone to fuse into it.
By a few weeks after surgery, the bone is attached to the metal parts. The bone is stable and the implant is durable. By not using cement, the surgeon can also avoid using a tourniquet. A tourniquet is used by most surgeons in the United States to drain blood from the leg and to shut off the blood supply to the leg during surgery. However, restricting this blood flow is known to result in temporary damage to the leg and thigh muscles and to prolong recovery. Avoiding use of a tourniquet allows faster recovery.
Using modern implants without bone cement and avoiding tourniquets allow for a faster recovery and better pain relief, particularly when combined with appropriate painkillers and the quadriceps-sparing surgical approach.
Lateral Approach Knee Replacement
Another method of performing knee replacement surgery, although rarely used, involves entering the knee joint from the outter aspect. The incision is made on the lateral side (outter) of the knee joint, and the kneecap and the muscles supporting it are disturbed even less than during a routine knee replacement procedure. This surgical approach, called the lateral approach, is another type of minimally invasive knee replacement surgery. The lateral approach allows muscle damage to be avoided, and the kneecap mechanics may be improved. This method of knee replacement is unusual, and surgeons rarely use it as it is more difficult to access all parts of the knee. However, it has some distinct advantages over traditional knee replacement surgery. Pain may be decreased and people are often able to return to walking faster.
Medically Reviewed by a Doctor on 8/20/2014
B Sonny Bal, MD
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
Must Read Articles Related to Minimally Invasive Knee Replacement
Patient Comments & Reviews
The eMedicineHealth doctors ask about Minimally Invasive Knee Replacement:
Minimally Invasive Knee Replacement - Patient Experience
Did you receive minimally invasive knee replacement surgery? Please describe your experience.
Minimally Invasive Knee Replacement - Results
Were you satisfied with the results of your minimally invasive knee replacement? Why or why not?
- Are You Managing Your RA?
- Arthritis and Lyme Disease
- Treating OA: Should You Give Injectables a Shot?